In the spirit of pursuing close economic and political ties with China, while downplaying the territorial dispute between our countries, let's talk about a doll I purchased online directly sourced from that country. There was a time when this doll was priced at around US$3 but now, the lowest price I saw for this doll is US$5. While I think that the US$5 price is still reasonable, I don't think I'll be buying another one any time soon. I do feel lucky to have got it at a lower price but at the back of my mind, I feel there is something wrong and I can't figure out what it is at the moment.
The doll came in a nondescript box with shipping labels. Judging from the labels, the item was shipped from China to a Lazada office before it was sent to me. As with most Lazada items, this was paid with cash on delivery so there is lower risk for the buyer. Inside the box, the item was wrapped in what seemed like Chinese newspaper (or it could be some Chinese government publication for propaganda purposes for all I know). This wrapper reminded me of the good old days.
The last time I bought something wrapped in newspaper was when we were poor. As a kid, I used to buy dried fish (daing or tuyo) at the suking tindahan. (See, I didn't italicize Filipino words. Deal with it.) Four small pieces are enough for a family of four. The very salty taste of the fish can be balanced with heaps of steamed rice. Dip the fish in vinegar and it's a feast. When we buy dried fish these days, we can no longer buy per piece. We have to buy it per pack, in plastic, mind you! We're rich now.
Feeling rich and #feelingblessed, I opened the package for my new doll. It's so white, like the rich people of the Philippines! Ok, I'm not the rich yet. I have a natural tan. I'm closer in color to your average Fashionista Ken, below.
At first glance, the male China doll looks like a copy of the Ken Fashionista, except for the head. The head looks familiar, though, making me think it might be copied from another doll. I'm not a doll-know-it-all so I can't say for sure. I'm getting a Prince Charming vibe but I searched for Prince Charming dolls and they were different. I like the face sculpt but the face paint is too bland for me. This is a good candidate for a repaint but I'm uninspired to paint these days. Go ask the world if you wanna know why.
The neck articulation is similar to the older Ken dolls with rotation only (no bending at the neck) although the neck joint is different. The hook is attached to the torso on this doll. I'd like to think that Mattel copied this idea for their new dolls and modified it a bit (using a hemispherical surface instead of a flat surface where the hook protrudes from). China is an expert in making things cheap (in more than one sense) and Mattel can learn (or has learned) a thing or two from Chinese manufacturers/designers.
It is easier to make this doll slip into (now dated) slim fit pants because you can adjust the foot. The feet on this doll has better articulation than your playline Ken doll but it doesn't necessarily mean it is better. I've read a review that the peg that holds the foot in place breaks easily (like how easily the hand broke on one of my Chinese dolls). I'm very careful when taking the shoes off this doll as the foot might get stuck on the shoe.
The hands on this doll is similar to the Harley Davidson Ken doll. It looks more relaxed than the Fashionista hands. Like the feet, the hands feel like they can be easily pulled from the arm breaking the peg. I won't risk ruining his hands just for the sake of certainty.
Speaking of how easy it is to break this doll, another joint that can easily be broken is the hip joint. I have tried to pry the legs off the hips of both Ken and Barbie dolls and it's tough. Doing that to this doll feels effortless in comparison. The arms and legs on this doll feels more like soft vinyl and not hard plastic making it more prone to staining.
This made me think. Why are these toys, intended for the Chinese market, not designed for tough play like those designed for Western market? Are the kids in the West more violent in playing with their toys? Am I being a Robin Padilla in asking that question? Or maybe I'm not being Robin Padilla enough for accommodating something foreign and lowering my expectations.
This toy is cheap and some may argue that you get what you pay for. Does that mean if I paid US$10 for this same toy instead of what I actually paid (US$3 total including shipping), the toy will magically be sturdier? This item is being sold are different prices ranging up to US$16.
Instead of a sense of happiness with a peace of mind, this toys leaves me with a lot of questions. This toy is just a little reflection of how things have been changing. Whether this change is good or bad, only time will tell. But if you're the type of person who thinks that change is good, go change your face.
3 comments:
It stands to reason that toys made for the Chinese markets are more cheaply made since the average income of a Chinese family is between $3,000 to $9,000 per year, well below the poverty level in the US. Of course, this average is skewed by the fact that there is a minority of high wage earners, so the average worker makes much less. I can't imagine that they would have much of a budget to spend on dolls!
Hi Phyllis. When you said "cheaply made," what do you mean? Do you mean poor quality, low manufacturing cost, or both?
I don't think this doll cost less to produce than the newer stiff Ken Fashionista. This doll has more parts that will require more manual labor to assemble. The legs and arms on this doll are not hollow like the newer Fashionista dolls. The plastic used on the limbs on this doll reminds me of the plastic on more expensive collector edition Barbie dolls. Since we don't have the actual data for the production cost, I'm assuming a lot here.
I'm comparing nude dolls, of course. The clothes will add more cost. But even nude used stiff Ken dolls cost more than on the local secondary market than this doll.
I'm not adding the marketing costs since we're talking about making the doll not selling doll. Marketing adds a major cost to the Mattel dolls but whether or not it adds value to the actual dolls to be enjoyed by the buyers is questionable.
As for the quality, this depends on what the buyer values more, durability or articulation. For me, it has, more or less, the same quality as the newer Ken dolls since articulation is important for me. I don't think we can say right away that this doll is "cheaply made." (I'm assuming the standard is the current playline Ken doll.)
I do agree with the idea of some buyers not having the power to demand higher quality for the toys they consume or some may not even bother making a fuzz out of any toys because of their economic standing, unlike us who are privileged enough to spend time and money on these toys.
Anyways, I hope that your response wasn't triggered by the idea of Western kids being more violent in playing with their toys. Of course, I don't believe that. I hope that my sarcastic tone on the blog entry was apparent. If the idea was offensive, it is to reflect how some Filipinos can be racist and offensive like, Robin Padilla, using nationalism as a defense at the same time not taking a stand against a country that trying to occupy our territory. This blog entry is not just about dolls.
Thank you for engaging. :)
After much rethinking, insinuating Western kids are more violent is a wrong thing to do. I should have never done that. I should have not echoed the brand of nationalism that promotes discrimination, like Robin Padilla's. I should not be like the people I fight against. I'm sorry.
Post a Comment